💘✨Goopy✨💘

treasures-and-beauty:

coxinhadoce47:

sch-uwu-lchen:

anexperimentallife:

idkinsertfanreferencehere:

femcassidy:

white people please just purchase native artwork and jewelry from native people i keep seeing idiot white people be like “waaah i wish i could support native creators but its cultural appropriation” girl why would beaders sell you their earrings then. just dont get a medicine wheel or a thunderbird then like damn it is that easy

http://www.beyondbuckskin.com/p/buy-native.html?m=1

If Native folks are making it to sell to white people with the approval of their tribe, it’s not “appropriation”–its support and appreciation! So yes, buy that native-made dream catcher, but not the mass produced fakes made by white people. Like, you can go to a pow wow and buy native crafts there, too.

here are some places to get native/indigenous goods and merch online if you can’t find something local or if physical access is an obstacle:

https://sweetgrasstradingco.com/
https://nativeharvest.com/
https://byellowtail.com/
https://www.salishstyle.com/
https://trickstercompany.com/
https://hutxh.com/
https://www.thentvs.com/
https://urbannativeera.com/
https://www.oxdxclothing.com/
https://kotahbear.com/
https://www.totemdesignhouse.com/
https://ginewusa.com/
https://eighthgeneration.com/

and the only native-owned comic shop in the world:
https://redplanetbooksncomics.com/

This semester in college we’ve been working with a company in an indigenous museum to help their sales

They work with native artists in all of Brazil, so the site is in portuguese

https://galeriamacunaima.com.br/

Buying from indigenous artists is not appropriation!

fremedon:

ratgirl-big-tits:

ruckuscauser:

shredsandpatches:

mr-craig:

finally-figured-it-out:

finally-figured-it-out:

There was a young man from Peru

Whose limericks stopped at line two

There once was a man from Verdun

There once was a man from the sticks
Whose limericks stopped at line six.
They were fine till line five
Then they took quite a dive —
But the problem is easy to fix
If you just ignore the last line, it doesn’t even follow the rhyme scheme oh god I’ve really lost control of this thing I’m so sorry…

There once was a man

From Cork who got limericks

And haiku confused.

There once was a man from the sticks

Who liked to compose limericks

But he failed at the sport

Because he wrote them too short

@limerickshere

There once was a fellow named Dan,
Whose poetry never would scan.
When told this was so,
He replied, “Yes, I know–
It’s because I try to squeeze as many syllables into the last line as I possibly can.”

lapisllong:

vaspider:

deeperlydreaming:

slutty-ankylosaurus:

toloveviceforitself:

futuristicballoondream:

bpdtomwambsgans:

when a british actor does an american accent everyone’s like “i didn’t even know they were british until they were on colbert.” but when americans do a british accent everyone’s like “they’re supposed to be from east cocksford but their glottal e’s are north dicksford. shameful.”

Saw an interesting interview with Hugh Laurie talking about this (on playing House and ‘getting away with’ doing an American accent):


“…. because they’re much less interested…they don’t have that 'Professor Higgins’ ear for…. class and background and geography and the way the British are much more attuned to wait a second where are you from and what trick are you trying to pull on me by… with that particular choice of words. I think partly again because it’s such a big country nobody really…. it doesn’t bother people so much where you’re from or why you sound the way you sound. America’s a country that’s too big to know itself. Someone living in Florida’s go no idea how people behave or what they eat or how they dress in Oregon, it’s just so far away - whereas we know, of course, we know absolutely everything about… every British drama we watch, we’re like, well that’s High Wycombe, that could never happen because it’s a one way system there! whereas America’s so mythically grand, it’s too big to know it'self, and that actually has an affect with things like accent. ”

This always confused me, too, because like. Do brits not *move*? My accent and diction are a horrifying hodgepodge because I was a child in the cajun part of the american south, an adolescent and young adult in the appalachian part, and then moved to New England as an adult and have lived here since (further, my parents were appalachian and new englander). Added to that, i watched a *lot* of tv as a kid and picked up aspects of tv’s weird region-less diction mixed with southern california. It would be weird if the way I talked *wasn’t* a semi-unique mess that’s hard to definitively place.

Does that not happen with these apparently hyper-specific British accents? Brits, do y'all not get people who pronounce one word in one region-specific way and another word in a way specific to a completely different region, because they lived both places?

Puzzling.

I can answer this! I was born in Pontypridd (Wales), moved to London (England) when I was 5, posh south England when I was 10, Belfast (Northern Ireland) when I was 17 and Dublin (Ireland) at 28.

The vast majority of British and Irish people think I sound Australian.

The one exception is when people try to fake an American southern accent, because Southerners absolutely do pay attention. You can’t go with a Texan southern accent if the character is from Mississippi, and Georgia accents are a whole thing, and Louisiana has two different accents, etc.

I mean, there’s a difference between a New York and a Philly accent, too.

Yeah. Americans WILL call you out on the “born and bred in ___ and never left” characters’ accents. You have specified too much to not match the accent AND the right verbiage/ idioms.

BUT! Moving around is a common enough thing here that when a character says, “I moved around a lot,” or, “I was raised by the TV!” we all think 'non-specific American accent’ and then move on, giving it no further thought.

identitty-dickruption:

happy disability pride month to people who thought that their very fucked up symptoms were completely normal. we’re talking people who were convinced that passing out daily was normal. people who thought everyone got migraines constantly. people who were told that bruising easily and bleeding all the time are things kids grow out of. you count as disabled, and you deserve to have your symptoms taken seriously

vaspider:

walugus-grudenburg:

splashcat413:

drillbaby:

mortimermcmirestinks:

vaspider:

vaspider:

satellite-slickers:

vaspider:

Feeding AI your likeness is bad. No matter what they say they will or won’t use it for, always assume that they can and will use it. Don’t give them the opportunity. This goes for your art, voice and music as well. https://t.co/uZhXL4C4ZJ  — Austin Lee Matthews (@amtraxVA) December 3, 2022ALT

friendly reminder that ai is not an automatic collage machine, and is not the devil, and i am sick of the fearmongering

i would give my writing an ai, i dont care, because i know how it actually works and knows that it doesnt fucking matter.

Unfriendly fucking reminder that AI is a copyright violating machine, that the original AI projects were funded by Elon Fucking Musk because he does not see value in the work of artists, and that AIs have problems with constantly putting signatures and watermarks back into art

BECAUSE THEY’RE TRAINED ON SO MUCH STOLEN, COPYRIGHT-VIOLATING ART.

Implying that those of us who have moral objections to AI art (and writing) are “fearmongering” or that we just don’t know what we’re talking about ignores the very very blatant art theft occurring.

image

But no, AI art doesn’t steal! That’s why it’s totally not reproducing watermarks here!

image

Or here!

image
image
image
image
image

Or signatures and copyright lines in all of these!

When you feed the AI which is BASED ON STOLEN ART, you are telling thieves that you’re cool with art being stolen as long as you get something temporary, free and momentarily cool.

image

Fuck off. ^__^

*rubs temples*

SO ANYWAY, LIKE I WAS SAYING.

AI is like a child learning art who cannot learn whether something is right or wrong.

the AI will see watermarks, and instead of saying “hey, mom, why are these words in the corner of the picture?” it’ll think “sometimes art just has random word-shaped text in the corner, and that’s normal” and then replicate it.

Also, if you are an artist and want to check if your work has been used to train AI, HaveIBeenTrained can search the database for matching images (no it doesn’t save the image you search with):

The start and end of this reblog chain have good stuff in them but the middle is just patently false. AI does not use art as “samples.” AI does not “manipulate art beyond recognition.” AI does not even remember that your art exists. It does not have that capacity. AI uses your art to learn the patterns of pixels that art tends to contain, develops a complicated statistical model of what art tends to look like, and then spits out statistically likely patterns of pixels that correlate with the description in its prompt. This is all it knows and all it has the capacity to know, it cannot possibly copy your art, only the tendencies you have as an artist.

This isn’t a defense of AI art models. They’re blind idiots spitting out images that mostly approximate something somebody might have made. They don’t replicate watermarks because they’re plagiarizing watermarked art the way a human might sample or trace a piece of art, they replicate watermarks because, like mortimermcmirestinks says, they do not understand the difference between watermarks and intended parts of the image. They do not understand content at all except in the sense that certain patterns are correlated with certain keywords. This is why most AI art sucks and sucks in the specific ways it does: Because it replicates patterns without understanding why those patterns exist, and so you get extra fingers and 7-pack abs and incoherent ornamentation and illegible watermarks.

And sometimes, an AI model will in fact spit out an exact or nearly-exact copy of something in its training data. Not because it copied it consciously, not only is it not conscious but oncr again it does not actually remember any specific piece art. It does it because it’s learned to produce statistically probable images and most things which exist are things which are likely to exist.

AI isn’t an automatic collage machine. It’s an “eh, close enough” machine. Which makes it a powerful tool for deskilling labor, it allows corporations to cut corners which could not previously be cut and sacrifice human values which could not previously be sacrificed. And it’s built on the back of both systematic privacy violations and exploiting the real labour of actual human artists. All of this is extremely bad, of course, but it is not at all the same kind of bad vaspider is saying it is, and I for one am a big proponent of criticizing things for their actual flaws instead of making up new accusations not grounded in reality.

AI can’t steal any specific piece of your art, nor can it actually do your job as an artist, but it can steal that job anyways.

THIS this this this so much this!!! AI misinformation is way way way too common on this site.

Like, even if you ***hate*** AI stuff (and there’s a million valid reasons to) why would you want to misunderstand it so badly? Know your enemy and all that.

It is really exhausting when people point out differences without meanings and pull a ‘piss on the poor’ to try to well actually people… very poorly.

It doesn’t matter if they’re replicating watermarks because they are plagiarizing watermarked art in the way that a human being understands plagiarism. The point is that the reproduction of the watermarks indicates that they are trained on watermarked art, that is, art which they do not have permission to use.

Y'all put an awful lot of words in my mouth that I didn’t say in order to correct me – badly, I might add – and continue to explain differences without meaning as if those differences have meaning to working artists.

It’s fucking tiresome.

pimentogirl:

foone:

lennon-and-trotsky:

the-haiku-bot:

tomboy-toni:

hylocereus–undatus:

profeminist:

“I always remember having this fight with a random dude who claimed that ‘straight white men’ were the only true innovators. His prime example for this was the computer… the computer… THE COMPUTER!!! THE COM-PU-TER!!!

Alan Turing - Gay man and ‘father of computing’ Wren operating Bombe - The code cracking computers of the 2nd world war were entirely run by women Katherine Johnson - African American NASA mathematician and ‘Human computer’ Ada Lovelace - arguably the 1st computer programmer”

- Sacha Coward

Also Margaret Hamilton - NASA computer scientist who put the first man on the moon - an as-yet-unmatched feet of software engineering, here pictured beside the full source of that computer programme. #myhero

Grace Hopper - the woman that coined the term “bug”  

- @robinlayfield

Grace Hopper did more than coin the term “bug”. She invented the first program linker in the early 1950s, for the UNIVAC I. A program linker translates instructions from one language to another (for example, numerical codes that represent instructions translated to machine code that computers can read), which is the very foundation of how computer’s operate independently. she also pulled a steve rogers and tried to enlist in the military a bunch of times and was denied. then, an exception was made for her when she joined the navy reserves, and she ended up serving for over 40 years (half of which was active duty). she retired from the navy Rear Admiral Grace Hopper. she was born in NYC in 1906. Grace Hopper was a fucking badass.

also computing was typically a job for women (many of whom were black women that made incredible contributions) back in the day, so it’s absolutely fucking wild that straight white men think they are the foundation of computer innovation. men PUSHED women out and took the credit.

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

Reblogging to do what the failed education system never did.

Reblogging to do

what the failed education

system never did.

Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.

Adding Wendy Carlos to the list! Trans icon and pioneer of synthesized music!!

Also, just about every computerized device outside of desktops is running ARM chips now. Your phone, your keyboard, your car, your watch. Basically everything.

image

And ARM was primarily designed by Sophie Wilson, a trans woman.

Please don’t forget Hedy Lamarr. Screwed over by the US government. She helped develop spread spectrum communication, which in part led to the development of WiFi and Bluetooth tech.


image

Originally posted by mydailyvintagephotos

the-haiku-bot:

theconcealedweapon:

Imagine that every time you asked “What time is it?”, people interpreted that as you refusing to believe that time exists, and they gave you a long, angry spiel about the importance of understanding time, and they still never told you what time it is, and you were considered the one with poor communication skills.

That’s what it’s like to be autistic.

Remember that when an autistic person asks why a rule exists.

Remember that when

an autistic person asks

why a rule exists.

Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.

gaphic:

pigcatapult:

pasteboard:

image

hey netizens! i’m not sure how many people are aware, but youtube’s been slowly rolling out a new anti-adblock policy that can’t be bypassed with the usual software like uBlock Origin and Pi-Hole out of the gate

BUT, if you’re a uBlock Origin user (or use an adblocker with a similar cosmetics modifier), you can add these commands in the uBlock dashboard to get rid of it!

youtube.com##+js(set, yt.config_.openPopupConfig.supportedPopups.adBlockMessageViewModel, false)

youtube.com##+js(set, Object.prototype.adBlocksFound, 0)

youtube.com##+js(set, ytplayer.config.args.raw_player_response.adPlacements, [])

youtube.com##+js(set, Object.prototype.hasAllowedInstreamAd, true)

reblog to help keep the internet less annoying and to tell corporations that try shit like this to go fuck themselves <3

Where do I copy-paste these to? “My filters”? “My Rules”?

‘my filters’! if you look closely you’ll notice the format is different between the two pages. the (website)(##)(additional text) format goes in filters